Given that fact, I suppose the training has to be specific and it needs to be effective. As well, you don't want to spend three years when you can maybe achieve that in six months or a year. There's obviously room for improvement in a number of areas.
Mr. Blakely, you said we need to cover more workers, cover seasonal workers, and cover a whole vast situation that we're not now covering, but at the same time you're saying it needs to be self-funding. The aspect I'd like to raise, depending on my time, is if you're going to add benefits, it's going to mean either an increase in premiums or an increase in the deficit.
I gather, Mr. Dorval, that your view is that there shouldn't be either of those. You would like to see the employer's share brought down and brought closer to equality with the employee's share. It's fine to say you'd like to cover a wider spectrum of people and so on, but what's the reality?
Mr. Dorval, what are your thoughts about that comment?