Thank you.
We are in an economic crisis, as you said, Mr. Dorval. This is therefore a temporary measure for a particular situation. We are currently choosing to help workers who already have a number of weeks. These are the ones in least need, essentially, if you compare them to many workers who have already lost their jobs and are not even entitled to employment insurance benefits. As a temporary measure, this choice does not seem to make sense. Is it a choice that you would have made?
If you had to choose a measure which, in times of an economic crisis, would help workers in need—the fundamental objective of employment insurance—would you have made the same choice, given that other measures extending the number of weeks were adopted in the last budget?