Thank you.
It's too bad Mr. Savage isn't here, because he's going to accuse me of having spoken in his absence with respect to some remarks he made. But I will, and he'll get it from the record here later.
He made some comments earlier, and he did at a point previously in the House today, and I think we need to get this out on the record. So through you, Mr. Chair, he was speaking about the 360. Just to get it on the record here, the cost for this bill is $1 billion over three years. We need to also point out the fact that with respect to the 360, he got the Parliamentary Budget Officer to cost it, and that was in terms of special benefits and part-time workers being excluded. Yet his platform, the Liberal platform, released yesterday, actually said that special benefits and part-time workers should have a 360-hour standard as well. So the cost of that proposal really is about $4 billion.
Mr. Savage is...misleading, I guess, to say it nicely or diplomatically, by saying something different in a different context.
But having got that on the record, and having corrected things in respect of that, I want to ask Mr. Schumann, off the top here, in terms of a clarification.... You spoke of certain workers who worked 10 to 15 years, but now they're not eligible with respect to this. There's something I wasn't catching there. I'm not sure if you meant 10 to 15 years but with periods of interruption along the way. Is that what you...?