That is fine, we are in favour of that approach. It is an aspect that we will have to study.
Let us take it a step further. It seems to me that there is something contradictory in your statement. Perhaps it is just a question of perception. You say that the system should go back to its fundamental values, which is to say that it would insure as many people as possible. But, at the same time, you say that we have to decrease premiums or that the plan should be revenue-neutral.
Would it not be more appropriate to refund the money that was appropriated from the fund in order to improve the system? I would like a very quick comment from you on that, because I also have a question for Mr. Blakely.