Precisely. It could be a worker who was not an apprentice before but who was a long-tenured worker. That person could change jobs or occupations and become an apprentice. They would be eligible under clause 2 of the bill, which stipulates that when you have worked more than 7 years, you may be eligible if you have met the other two requirements. Is that correct?
There is one question from the outset, and it will apply to every clause in the bill. No one who has worked for less than 7 years will be eligible for these benefits.