I think we've been clear in our documents and also in the discussion that obviously the 360 hours are vitally important. You can design the best EI system in the world, but if people can't access it because the threshold is too high, then you have a really nice document, but it doesn't really do anything for anybody. From our perspective, the 360 hours are what needs to be done.
The two improvements have already been talked about in this room. One of them is in our document, that we want a benefit rate of 60%, and people have already raised the question of benefit duration. We certainly would agree with 50 weeks. We understand what it means to people. So those would be the strengths.
You have to deal with access, you have to deal with benefit level, and you have to deal with benefit duration.
Again, you can deal with a whole bunch of other things, but if people can't get into the system, they can't access the other things either. They can't get a better benefit and they can't get a longer duration if necessary.