No, I think we've been very clear that uniform access should be a permanent measure and it should be for all points across the country.
When the change was made in the 1990s to, first of all, require employers whose employees worked more than 15 hours a week to pay into EI, because you'll recall that before that they didn't, we actually supported the change from weeks to hours because we thought this would actually open the door for a lot of people, for the people I talked about, women and young workers, who had periods of unemployment. Maybe the unemployment benefit wouldn't be huge, but at least they would get some small benefit.
What we didn't count on was that the hours threshold was going to be so high that people wouldn't get access. If you say we have a $57 billion surplus, that was created in part by people who have paid into a system for a long time now but have no hope of ever collecting the way the system is. Essentially the rules have to change to benefit the people who are actually paying into the system.