What you've just said is interesting because you can look at that number in two ways.
Earlier I was told—I forget which meeting we were at—that the reason there's a smaller number of women collecting EI as a result of the recession is that they're doing better in the recession. It could actually be the fact that most of them are not eligible to access EI, that is, they are doing jobs that don't actually give them the opportunity because of the entry and the level.
As you were saying, Ms. Byers, they have lost jobs but cannot necessarily access in that situation.
There's also the situation that I've seen recently in families where the husband may have lost a job. He may have worked in one of those industries. The wife has gone back to work to try to make up for that because EI has been exhausted by the husband. So she's gone back to work part time. This again goes to family stresses and so on.
So is 360 hours, in your view, the optimum or the ideal spot? I'm just wondering about trying to make sure that the women I'm talking about in this report would be able to access it.