I want to recap what we have here.
We have a motion on the floor by Mr. Martin. We have an amendment by Mr. Savage. We have a subamendment by Mr. Komarnicki now, who is suggesting that you want to leave in Mr. Savage's amendment, but after “2000,” strike out “and there not being noteworthy progress towards that goal”. You also want to strike “at three-year intervals”. This is just to ensure that I'm correct.
Now we're talking about the subamendment, which includes those other things, so if there's any discussion, we're going to be talking about what Mr. Komarnicki has right now.