I was coming to that, because it concerns me somewhat. I think in the first hour of debate you said that you were going to seek an amendment to allow Quebec to opt out of a national housing strategy, and I think the words were “with full compensation”.
But when I look at your amendment, it concerns me somewhat. I'm looking at your amendment 6 for proposed clause 3.1. It says that “the Government of Quebec may choose to be exempted from the application of this Act”. That's not like totally exempted; the words I'm reading there could allow Quebec to say—and let's forget compensation for the moment—that they are going to be exempted from this particular strategy.
You're proposing that amendment. Why would you want a province to be exempted if you're going to have a national strategy?