Mr. Shapcott, in terms of what this bill can bring, the change to improve the dynamics of housing action in the country, you said we need to have a means of bringing people together. We want that to be effective; we don't want people to meet for the sake of meeting. What do you see in the bill to make that happen, and is there anything that isn't in the bill that you would see as necessary to make it happen? You've been doing this for a little while.
For example--and I don't mean to be provocative on this point--there's nothing binding in the bill. We could meet, we could have a strategy, and no one goes to jail if we don't come up with x number of units. Because you really endorsed the idea of bringing people together, could you elaborate on why that would be helpful in terms of getting the different people into the room and coming up with some kind of joint declaration of strategy?