Again, along the same lines as what Mr. Komarnicki raised, a technical legal term is used here, but the end result is that it may well and quite likely would mean for greater expense.
I don't understand the logic. I know we're getting into highly technical stuff here, but the bottom line is that it's going to be a greater drawdown. I would think, then, that it does contravene and it's against the royal recommendation.
That's my view.