Thank you, Mr. Komarnicki.
I see “Section 97 of the Act is replaced”.... We're talking about replacing line 4 on page 7, and “by the following” is already on line 5. Do we need to delete “by the following”, since it's already in there?
On November 26th, 2009. See this statement in context.
November 26th, 2009 / 5:45 p.m.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Dean Allison
Thank you, Mr. Komarnicki.
I see “Section 97 of the Act is replaced”.... We're talking about replacing line 4 on page 7, and “by the following” is already on line 5. Do we need to delete “by the following”, since it's already in there?
See context to find out what was said next.