I have a question. I asked this question in B.C. That's where I'm from. I got a very nasty, sort of uppity reply, and I can't blame her. But I've been on reservations in B.C. and I have seen this first-hand, and I am wondering if it happens here. That is where the chief gets the money and then the money doesn't trickle down to the people, where it should be going; he keeps it for himself and his family or the group he has around him.
Do you think there should be fiscal accountability for the chiefs?