I have a point of order. The point of order would be that the chair has made a decision that this group accepted and that's not different from the decision now made. I would say this group ought to be precluded from challenging the chair, because it's the same issue. The fact of the matter is that this motion is not any different from the other motion, which this committee has already accepted, saying essentially if you allow one province to pull out, at its option—
On December 8th, 2009. See this statement in context.