I agree with you, obviously, that there was an inequity in the budget, in the sense that people at the top, or certain groups, did receive more than those at the bottom. In that sense, it was not a progressive budget.
However, there were a number of measures in the budget that were progressive from the point of view of people at the bottom of the income distribution. Again, we've already talked about the working income tax benefit. That certainly focuses on the bottom and is very good for equity. Also, the increased spending on the national child benefit, again, is very good for equity. Of course, there's the five-week extension of EI benefits, which I think should be even longer, but that's certainly better than nothing—although it doesn't go far enough. Then there were also a large number of measures for training in the budget. And those I think are very, very positive for the underprivileged.