Thank you, Madam Chair.
Statistics Canada's low-income cut-offs are widely used by people. We made reference to those today as a measure of poverty, but Statistics Canada insists that the LICO not be used for that purpose, that it's not an official poverty measure. They are talking more in terms of a social consensus, not the statistical LICO.
So I guess my question is—and maybe we'll go down the line here, and perhaps you can just give a quick yes or no, and maybe a sentence of two of explanation or gloss that way—do you believe that LICO itself overstates the measure of poverty in Canada?
Do you agree with that, starting with Ken?