Thank you very much.
My question is for any of you, but particularly Mr. Battle. I've been at this for a long time. I've noted over the last 10 to 15 years that the driver in all of these anti-poverty strategies has been more a labour market strategy, getting people into the workforce, lowering the welfare wall, and that kind of thing, which leaves a lot of people out, such as the unemployable, a lot of them with mental health issues, and lots of families with single-parent families.
I know you designed a program, the child tax benefit and the supplement that was clawed back initially from families that weren't in the workforce. If we're trying to take children out of the welfare system, that didn't do it. It shoved them back in, in a way that I don't think they ever anticipated or expected.
Do you foresee us moving towards a national poverty strategy that isn't so readily tied to a labour market strategy?