I wonder if we shouldn't have this motion held in abeyance to get some understanding of the timelines and constraints involved in getting this kind of information. We committed to doing a report on what we have heard, and this may or may not be an impediment. It seems it may require a lot of work, but it may not. Somebody might know, but it certainly wouldn't be something that we as a committee would be aware of prior to voting on this motion.
In essence, I don't have any direct objection to the information, although it might be more difficult and time-consuming to get than we are anticipating, and I'm not so sure we would want it after our report. I think we're getting close to the place where we'll start considering the report fairly soon. Ought we not to have some basic information first in terms of what's involved in getting this information and how long it may take? I don't know... It's just a thought.