I think you have general consensus about the fact that we should do the study. The only issue I might have is that the last part of the motion states as follows: “...determining at the outset the exact parameters of the study to ensure a clear focus with specific goals and a commitment to providing solutions with a high probability of success”. I'm not sure how we get there, but it seems to me that we really need to study two things: the specific barriers that impede the quality of life of persons with disabilities and their full participation in the labour market and economy.
That would cover, I think, the range of possibilities, so I would like to move a friendly amendment to omit those words that are less than clear and substitute the part that would read “quality of life of persons with disabilities and full participation in the labour market and economy”. That, it would seem to me, would cover the breadth of what we need to talk about. Then it would be up to the various players, I suppose, to add witnesses to those areas.