May I add something on some of the other points you raised?
We would welcome a better EI program for the unemployed. We've been saying for years that it needs to be modernized. There is the whole question of women in the workplace and less than regular employment and so on. We would welcome all of that. Quite frankly, there's $57 billion of workers' and employers' money that could have been put into a better program for people than one that is not there for them when they really need it.
But there's also a reality. You will recall a parliamentary committee that in 2003-04 came out with 28--I believe it was 28--very good recommendations. But we said as well that the primary issue is that you have to be able to get people into the system. We can have a really good UI system, but if you're excluded because of a high number of required hours, then you have something that just looks good on paper.
Here is one last point on the exhaustees. When I have appeared in front of this committee before, one of the things we've asked for is that HRSDC do something that is in fact done in the United States, apparently, which is to give a monthly report on the exhaustee rate and which you can't get here in the same way.