I made it clear when we started, and I think we've made it clear every time we've appeared in front of this committee, that the three priorities are access--that's the 360 hours--and the benefit level and the benefit duration, which have to be raised. We want to make sure people can get into the system when they need to, that when they get there, there's at least some semblance of an income for the period of unemployment, and that they have some ability to have that benefit during extended periods of time when they need it again.
Just on the point you raised earlier about how some people say EI is paying people to stay at home, it's only paying people to stay at home if there are no jobs, if there's no place for them to get another job. So again, to go back to some of our positions, this country needs a national industrial employment and training strategy to make sure we're making the best use of people, both during the time they're working and when they're not working.
It would be interesting... If I ever get the time, I'm going to go back and dust off those 28 recommendations, because I'd be willing to bet those recommendations aren't much different from what we need now. But we still go back to the top three: access, benefit level, and benefit duration.