Before we get back to Sylvain, my friend Mr. Godin indicated what happened with our Liberal colleagues, when they used a good portion of that for pet political projects. But we've put in an EI financing board that sets rates based on the general principle that rates and benefits, over time, must equalize. So in that sense, it makes sure that you can't use it for general revenues. It must be used for what it's meant for, and that's employment insurance. We've put a mechanism in place so that doesn't happen again.
Having said that, I'll go back to my question. Do you or do you not disagree with the bill when it tends to use the regionally differentiated unemployment rates and number of hours for the length of benefits? If you're opposed to that, what would the cost be to eliminate this, or have you done any costing on that?