The money's already been spent.
I take it, then, that notwithstanding that the bill does make the qualifying period 360 hours, you take objection to the fact that it doesn't extend the benefits in the same way, but you don't know what the cost would be to eliminate that.
The other thing you talked about was raising the benefit rate from 55% to 60%. Again, the cost estimated by the library research team analysts, I believe, was $1.1 billion. When you add the $1.1 billion to the billion or so more for the 360 qualifying period, plus some billions more that you haven't costed... If you add all those together, would you agree with me that they would put upward pressure on any premiums that employers and employees would have to pay? Would you agree with that?