I would like to add that certainly, in the coming months, there will be a debate about how to raise premiums. There was already an announcement on that point in the last budget.
The present situation is such that we are starting from a precise point in time for assessing the situation in the fund. We are not considering the surpluses accumulated in the past. That raises a big question, because we need to take them into account. Otherwise, we are going to adopt point x as the standard for assessing it, without regard for the fact that billions of dollars were accumulated before that point. We are going to start from point x as our basis and then assess what future premiums will be and what the balance will be.
The equation has to take into consideration the entire economic cycle, to see what the situation in the fund is. It is very clear, and this was being said before the reforms, that the fund has experienced substantial surpluses and the scheme could be improved. The scheme is good for workers who lose their jobs and it is also good for communities because it provides an economic stimulus that supports them. That should also be considered in the debate when we discuss how the scheme will be funded after the major economic crisis we have just experienced.