No, I wouldn't agree with that. Despite the fact that there are parts of the information missing, when we factor in the level of contributions made over the last 10 years, before the crisis, with the accumulated $57 billion, we think that over time, with the stimulus it would bring to communities in creating jobs, it would contribute to reducing the unemployment rate and the usage of that system, providing jobs for workers to work at, not to collect unemployment insurance. Then, with that economic stimulus, it would provide good jobs for workers and would rebalance the books automatically.
On April 26th, 2010. See this statement in context.