Thank you, Mr. Martin.
Mr. Martin, I must inform you that in fact it's out of the hands of Mr. Poilievre or anyone else, because I must rule that this amendment is inadmissible. The reason it is inadmissible, according to the analyst who has advised me, is what House of Commons Procedure and Practice states on page 766:
An amendment to a bill that was referred to a committee after second reading is out of order if it is beyond the scope and principle of the bill.
The fact that you have brought in the police means that it is beyond the scope and principle of the bill, particularly since by bringing in this other body of people, it would add to the cost of the bill itself, and that would require a royal recommendation as well.