Thank you.
I want to come back to the issue of the provinces, but I'm just going to read from the editorial in this morning's Winnipeg Free Press. Like most of us, it's generally supportive of the bill and the fact that people like Clifford Olson, who is cited a lot, obviously shouldn't be entitled to pensions. There are lots of other prisoners who have different circumstances. But what they're speaking about is the 90 days. It says:
Ninety days, however, may be too short a duration to see the move as cost-effective, given the administrative work in processing and the fact that prisoners may lose the house or the apartment if jailed for a couple of months.
I wonder if you can shed light on that issue.