I understand that, and I don't want to be too combative here—we're largely on the same page on this--but it just seems to me that it's been done before where governments have made initiatives that balanced off one thing against the other. Because it's not from the same revenue stream or payment stream doesn't mean that one couldn't say let's make sure that we take that and put it toward victims of crime. I just wonder if that's something you might consider going forward as a government.
