Thank you.
That's sort of the point I was going to. For the subamendment we're discussing, the inclusion of the words “With the authorization of the incarcerated person” actually confers an obligation on CSC to get their permission to provide information that they already provide with respect to the release date or anticipated release date. So it actually does confer a second obligation. I think the first is that....
Well, there's a question about the earlier part of the proposed amendment, but I'll speak to that later, probably. We're only speaking to the subamendment right now.
They already have the authorization to provide an anticipated release date. This would actually confer an obligation on them now to go and consult with the inmate to provide the information about their anticipated release date.
I'm voting against the subamendment.