Again, I would quite concur, and I think that was inferred before, that this is personal information. I mean, I don't want to give certain things off to government. I don't have any reason necessarily to be paranoid about it, but I can well understand somebody coming out of corrections may be more so that way.
But if, in fact, they don't have a bank account, yes, a cheque can be issued to a certain address, but I do know as well that if banking officials were here today, they would say they're pretty reluctant to be cashing cheques on the part of some other person. They want to know whether you have an account here, that kind of thing. Yes, the government cheque is good, there's not going to be a bounce of that cheque, we assume, but they want to be sure that this is the person whose name is on the cheque, obviously.
So these kinds of things, again, I think as you attested to, can only be provided by the individual and not Corrections Canada. I think it's a bit of an intrusion to assume that Corrections Canada corrals that information to provide it to Service Canada.
So I would have some concerns about the wording of the amendments in terms of the overmuch onus it places in view of some of this information that would be required to do the transaction and have it updated and cheques coming again.