Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Madam Bonsant, for bringing this forward.
On the costing period, as I read through it, it talked about an offset, if you will. In a sense, if you're covered by some other—I believe the example was the case of Quebec, where there is some compensation to offset for the leave, if you will, that would reduce the unemployment. When Mr. Couture actually gave us the stats, were we looking at that offset as well, or was this simply a pure number of x number of folks times x number of benefits becomes this? Or was the offset actually looked at in that comparator?
I say that based on, for instance, the fact that there are many private insurance plans through employers that would cover extended periods of sick time.