Madam Chair, I am challenging your ruling. My point of order is as follows, Madam Chair. Please hear me out, Madam Chair.
Mr. Vellacott's comments are intended to impute certain motives to Ms. Bonsant, given that he has alluded to bills which have come before Parliament in the past. However, that is not what is being debated today. Furthermore, his comments were ill-intentioned, because he is imputing certain motives. For that reason, my point of order should be deemed to be in order. Mr. Vellacott should be reminded to abide by the rules and return to the debate and subject which is under consideration today.