Sure. Thanks, Tony.
Again, the process that has been in place for determining the content of the census had the appropriate checks and balances to ensure appropriate information was being collected. The first step is to consult with data end-users to assess their socio-economic data needs. So in the context of the report the committee has just released, there are all kinds of data we need now that we can compare to 2006 and so forth.
I'd love to see more data being collected on actual deprivation, if appropriate questions could be put forward in a census about the material deprivation that Canadians are experiencing, because we know that's obviously real, but it's sometimes hard to get access to real deprivation data.
I think the system wasn't broken, and now a decision has been made to fix a problem that really didn't exist. It would be nice to have a sense, leaving the discussion today, if there's still an opportunity for this decision to be reversed.