Sometimes there's a question of the interpretation of the laws, whether it's the Hague convention or whatever. Sometimes we don't know how the local laws of the country apply to the situation. This is something we got into. I guess you can never get two lawyers to agree on anything, but they had different interpretations of the law. It seemed that they were at loggerheads and nobody would back up. One said it should be one way; the other said it should be another way. Who, in the end, has priority? Is it the country where the child is coming from?
On November 25th, 2010. See this statement in context.