I'm going to take the liberty of answering first before I forget what I was going to say.
Financial incentives are always cited as a way of meeting the needs of the child or the family, or both.
In our recent consultations of families of adoptive parents, one of the factors that emerged and that does not come under a financial statute is the need for practical support with regard to the programs offered. Does this mean a reduction or a tax credit? Perhaps.
However, to the extent the money or funding is provided indirectly by creating support systems, clinical or otherwise, I believe that the parents of young people, particularly those with special needs, very much acknowledge the value of these programs that enable them to enjoy certain advantages.
This is also a long-term investment, unlike a credit that is granted every year. I say that without downplaying the importance of the tax credit. These kinds of programs would be welcome, to the extent that the child could be kept in a family environment, while enjoying a social safety net.