It's a shame that the human aspect is not more present when employment insurance is mentioned. It's as if injecting more resources had no developmental effect on Canada's economy and that of its regions. People who have access to employment insurance are able to benefit their community, because they must spend money on clothing, food and transportation. So these people are reinvesting government funds.
So why doesn't the same principle apply? Investing in infrastructure helps stabilize the economy. Why do people not use the same reasoning by making the same investment in employment insurance and understanding that it has the same developmental effect, both in human and economic terms?