For whatever it's worth, to be “appended” is certainly clear in its intention. It's not to be tabled and considered, as was in the first motion, which has been rescinded. If all of the other committees are going to file their reports in the House, as they will, we will then duplicate the filing by appending the reports but not considering them, which in my mind defies a certain amount of logic. If the sole purpose is to add a piece of paper to the report, a piece of paper that's already going to be tabled in the House and filed by another committee, it doesn't achieve very much, and that's where we've come to. It points out with particular clarity what was intended in the first motion and why this one is contrary to it, and lacking.
The other interesting thing is that it comes after people have relied on the first motion, which I've always maintained, and conducted themselves accordingly, and that's most unfortunate.