I would like a little clarification from you and the lawyers. If the essence is that they participate in the benefits, does that mean that if they participate in the benefit they can't thereafter not participate in the benefit if it doesn't line up with their objectives?
Obviously, it allows them the option to participate or not on an ongoing basis. If we look at it in the first place, we say, well, they may participate—let's assume they do—do they have to continue to participate? I don't think so, according to this, because they may say it doesn't line up with what they're doing and therefore they're not going to participate.
I want some clarification on that. It seems a bit fetched.