In deference, I was speaking...and your ruling was with respect to the point of order. This is with respect to the amendment itself.
Of course, Madam Folco was referring to the status of Quebec and how they have special arrangements and so on. I'm just saying that the Speaker has indicated that although Quebec may have other arrangements in other cases, in this case, the bill talks about a very narrow point. It's not to allow someone like Quebec to decide on its own to do the various things that are outlined. They could, in some legislation, but we have to remember that this bill has passed second reading and is not at the stage where amendments can be made, because its scope has been defined.
I think the instruction was that we deal with the role of provinces, and that would be not only Quebec. If they were going to move an amendment, if they think it's in order, they should say that all the provinces of Canada, including Quebec, may, as a party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—and I might want to know what that means and gives as a special right—participate in the benefits of this act with respect to its own choices, its own programs, and its own approach related to housing on its territory.