The point of order is that if the ruling is that the vote didn't count, the vote still needs to be completed, right? The chair does have a say. So we can't entertain a unanimous consent motion at this time to count hers as a vote.
February 8th, 2011 / 11:10 a.m.
Conservative
Jeff Watson Conservative Essex, ON
The point of order is that if the ruling is that the vote didn't count, the vote still needs to be completed, right? The chair does have a say. So we can't entertain a unanimous consent motion at this time to count hers as a vote.
See context to find out what was said next.