Thank you.
Perhaps I will pose a question to the two lawyers. With respect to the New Brunswick case, I would suspect that they called expert testimony to show the cause and effect of age on benefits and pensions and so on. Do you know who they might have been?
Another question flowing from this is that there was a suggestion, at least I think so, by Mr. Farrell that there be an explicit provision—I would gather in the legislation we're considering—to allow employers to establish workforce skills testing programs that commence or increase in frequency as an employee's age increases, which in itself would be age discrimination. But if one were to do that, what's your point of view on that? Secondly, is there any legislation that allows for that to happen?
I have a third question, and I'll leave it at that. As you start thinking about this thing it becomes more complex. Employers can always prove an issue of bona fide requirements, but I suspect it would be much harder for them to do that on an objective or subjective basis than allowing for an exception specifically provided for by legislation, as Mr. Farrell suggests.
Perhaps, Christopher, you may want to start, and then we'll move over to Philippe. I had three points.