Thank you.
It is a function of the limits of the administrative tribunal's authority. They were given the ability to interpret the charter and to make a ruling that a piece of legislation like section 15 is unconstitutional. But they don't have the power the courts have to strike it down; they only have the power to declare it inoperative for the purpose of the case before it.
That's what the tribunal did. The case came from Mr. Vilven and Mr. Kelly, and for the purpose of those complainants they declared it inoperative. But others need to be bringing different complaints.
That is one of the challenges with the system. Therefore, this committee's work can address the issue much more broadly than a specific complaint could.