It varies. It's more frequent in some regions. At the biggest office, the one in Montreal, it's very rare. In this specific case, people will often request hearing postponements so that they can be heard by three members. There is quite a sustained frequency of hearings before the board of referees.
In the regions, for example, I've heard of a number of cases in Gaspé and Abitibi in which people agreed to be heard before two persons, or else the hearing date would have been postponed unduly. You don't necessarily get bad results, but that is a contributing factor to reducing the make-up of the panel. Incidentally, and with all due respect for Mr. Komarnicki, I think this is a matter related to the procedure and practices of the board of referees. In a way, the make-up of the panel is an integral part of our ability to have an effective appeal mechanism to achieve the objectives for which it was constituted.