I couldn't exactly say. It might seem like a lack of objectivity. However, the legal representatives of the union parties are trained by a law firm in Montreal. They are trained entirely outside the system. They receive legal training.
As I say in my document, three parties are involved in a hearing: the worker, the employer and the commission. If the members of the board of referees are trained by one of the three parties, that is to say the commission, there is an appearance of conflict of interest. Consequently, law firms should really provide the training. Some firms are specialized in unemployment issues. They are the ones that could provide the best training. The existing documents are very good; they are even excellent. I have them all. However, a person who offers training can influence future opinions and interpretations.