Your question reveals precisely why we want a green paper to look at the options and the implications. Let me be clear: there was no consensus on the committee that we should move to a guaranteed annual income. The consensus was that we should have a green paper on how it might work in comparison with the other programs now in place. That's where the consensus was, and that's what the report recommends. Your questions are precisely the kind that would have to be dealt with in that kind of green paper.
On March 24th, 2010. See this statement in context.