My colleague may disagree, and he's my chairman so I will defer, but I would say to move it on the disability front first. That has two benefits.
First of all, I don't think there's one Canadian in fifty who would differ with the notion that we can do a better job for the disabled, and that's a way of opening this discussion. Because if we can move on the disabled in a way that is fiscally responsible but socially humane and progressive, then of course people will say, well, if we can do that, what about the vast majority of those people who live beneath the poverty line who aren't disabled and have other difficulties? They'll say, “Why would we leave them out?”
In a democracy, building consensus is really important, and I think there's probably a stronger consensus around the disabled than there is around the larger question of the sort of income security proposition that is on the table.