Sure, it would be appropriate to pass it around and let everybody have a look at it.
While he's doing that, what it does is if we had the two hours, everybody would get on in the first round at seven minutes. It would just continue in the same fashion, round after round, until we were done. You'd get at least two rounds plus some more. In the one-hour session you wouldn't complete two rounds.
Of course, in the two-hour session it would be my view that the witnesses should be given a little more time. In the one-hour session they should be constrained somewhat in time to give more opportunity for questions.
Although that's been the practice, we might want to move to one panel for two hours, if we have the time for that, to give more time for questioning. There is nothing to prevent us from doing that.
Does everybody have a copy of the new motion?