I'll rule on this point, and I expect my ruling to be respected.
There is the point that if you don't give the entitlement for the extension to some who would otherwise be entitled to employment insurance benefits, that would result in their not having those benefits when they leave the point of incarceration. That might impinge upon their rehabilitation or their ability to reintegrate into society. So in that fashion, there is some basis for questioning along that specific line. But this questioning is beyond that, and to that extent it would be out of order.
If you want to narrow it to what I have indicated, then you can go forward. If not, I would rule the question out of order.