I have one last question.
In your example of your not being able to get back the workers you had because they are skilled, I would presume from that then that they are laid off for let's say six months of the year, and you employ them for six months a year. Are you saying through your testimony here and your answers to the opposition questions that if an individual went out and got a full-time, 12-months-a-year job, you're against that individual doing that?